Will the Children Return to
Play? by Jay Heinrichs
Visit
Runner's World Online We inspire and enable people to improve their
lives and the world around them
Coopertown Elementary School was the perfect
place to play when I was a kid in the 1960s. The one-story, '50s-modern affair
in the Philadelphia suburbs was surrounded by sports fields, baseball diamonds,
and a basketball court. Adults were blessedly absent. Freed from supervision,
we played pickup basketball games, chose up armies for toy-gun battles, or just
rode our bikes around the empty parking lot. Nobody "exercised" or "worked
out." We were just having fun. I drove by Coopertown's playground
last summer, and noticed that things hadn't changed--same fields, same swings,
same maddeningly unclimbable oak tree--except for the kids. There weren't any.
Adults were all over the place, running, biking, and hitting baseballs, while
the only child in sight was a little boy playing catch with his dad. It was an
eerie kind of role reversal, like some schoolyard version of Planet of the
Apes. Where were the kids? My hunch is that a lot of them were at home, staring
at glowing screens, having virtual fun. Coopertown is just one
example of a larger, radical transformation in American society: Much of
childhood has been moved indoors. Unfortunately, kids are paying for this
change with their bellies, as the percentage of American children who are obese
has more than tripled over the last 4 decades. Those 9 million
overweight kids face a potentially scary future. If they don't slim down by age
20, their life expectancy will drop by up to 20 years. An obese child is more
susceptible than his peers to diabetes, heart disease, asthma, and, maybe worst
of all, sheer misery. A study published in the Journal of the American Medical
Association this summer surveyed the physical activity, doctor's visits, and
sick days of obese kids and found their quality of life comparable to that of
young cancer patients on chemotherapy. The media rightly blame the
supersized American diet. The portion size of French fries, hamburgers, and
soda served in restaurants has grown by two to five times since 1977. But
weight is an equation with two variables, so here's an equally alarming stat:
The average teenager is 13 percent less physically active today than in 1980,
according to Lisa Sutherland, Ph.D., a researcher at the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill. That's a lot more calories going in, and a lot less
being burned. What about sports and exercise programs? Kids aren't
getting much of either. In the past decade alone, the number of children
participating in daily physical-education classes at school has dropped from 42
to 29 percent. That said, children don't always need teachers to get them in
shape. In fact, one of the most effective fitness "programs" may consist of
nothing more than letting a kid loose on a playground. A 75-pound child riding
a bike burns 90 calories in 45 minutes, the equivalent of one large
chocolate-chip cookie. But a kid who spends a half-hour running around and
another 15 minutes watching ants carry crumbs will burn more than 260 calories,
equal to the amount in a large cookie and a Coke. In other words, just acting
like a kid once a day can make the difference in body weight of a pound a
month. Add walking, swimming, biking to school, or a weekly hike in the woods,
and who needs to worry about exercise? That's where you and I come
in. This magazine's parent company, Rodale Inc., is launching a nationwide
initiative to combat childhood obesity. Meanwhile, Rodale's sports magazines
(Backpacker, Bicycling, Runner's World, and Scuba Diving) are studying how kids
have fun on their own. We'll also be researching the ways adults can provide
children safe opportunities for outdoor play. You'll see some answers in our
magazines. My personal hypothesis? The number of overweight kids will
start shrinking the moment we see playgrounds like the one at Coopertown fill
up with kids. |